<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>New Jersey Zoning and Land Use Law &#187; Landlord/Tenant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.njlandlaw.com/archives/category/landlordtenant/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.njlandlaw.com</link>
	<description>Helping to understand land development &#38; preservation in the garden state.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:33:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>NJ Appellate Division Rules that Commercial Tenants are not Entitled to Personal Notice of a Redevelopment Designation but can Challenge the Designation in a Condemnation Action</title>
		<link>http://www.njlandlaw.com/archives/332</link>
		<comments>http://www.njlandlaw.com/archives/332#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher DeGrezia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eminent Domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landlord/Tenant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notice Requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redevelopment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Condemnation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DeRose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Due Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harrision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iron Mountain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landlord]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Redevelopment and Housing Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LRHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redeveloper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tenancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tenant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njlandlaw.com/?p=332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Andy S. Norin, Esq. and Joshua J. Franklin, Esq.
On March 13, the Appellate Division decided Iron Mountain Information Management Inc. v. City of Newark, 405 N.J. Super. 599, which addresses the scope of the Appellate Division’s prior ruling in Harrison Redevelopment Agency v. DeRose, 398 N.J. Super. 361 (2008), regarding notice requirements under the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.njlandlaw.com/archives/332/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

