By John C. Ryder, P.E., P.P., P.W.S., C.M.E. Effective November 2, 2009, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) has amended the Freshwater Wetlands Protection Act Rules to expanded the list of Freshwater Wetlands Statewide General Permits (SGP) requiring mitigation as follows: SGP No. 2 (Underground utility lines); SGP No. 6 (Isolated wetlands); SGP Nos. 10A & 10B (Road crossings); SGP No. 11 (Outfalls & intake structures); SGP No. 21 (Above ground utility lines); and SGP 27 (Redevelopment of previously disturbed areas). Wetlands permits previously requiring mitigation included: SGP No. 4 (Hazardous site investigation and cleanup); SGP No. 5 (Landfill closures); and all Individual Permits (IP). » Read the rest of this entry «
NJDEP Amends Freshwater Wetlands Mitigation Requirements: New Rules Could Require the Replacement of Wetland Areas as Small as a New Drainage Outfall Pipe
November 18th, 2009 | Posted by:
Christopher DeGrezia
2![]()
Site Remediation Reform Act: How Will the Act Impact the Use of Alternate Remediation Standards (ARS)?
November 11th, 2009 | Posted by:
Christopher DeGrezia
1![]()
Although the Site Remediation Reform Act (SRRA) gives Licensed Site Remediation Professionals (LSRPs) substantial authority once the exclusive purview of NJDEP, not all of the functions held by NJDEP case managers under the pre-SRRA process for remediation will be transferred to the LSRP. Such is the case with Alternate Remediation Standards (ARS). An ARS is a remediation standard developed for use at a given site based on site-specific conditions and risks that is often less restrictive than adopted standards. One of the laws modified by SRRA continues to allow the use of ARS in lieu of the established minimum soil remediation standards for residential or non-residential use. » Read the rest of this entry «
Site Remediation Reform Act: Will the New Permit Program for Operation, Maintenance and Inspection of Engineering and Institutional Controls be Different from NJDEP’s Current Biennial Certification Program?
October 30th, 2009 | Posted by:
Christopher DeGrezia
0![]()
Currently, NJDEP requires a biennial certification for engineering and institutional controls. Every two years, a certification must be prepared, signed and submitted to NJDEP reporting on the monitoring, inspection and maintenance for caps, covers, fences, signs, Classification Exception Areas (CEAs), deed notices and other engineering and institutional controls implemented as part of the remediation of a contaminated site. Under the Site Remediation Reform Act (SRRA), NJDEP will now be implementing a new permit program for this purpose. NJDEP is wrestling with the best way to move forward with the transition of these requirements into a permit program. » Read the rest of this entry «
DEP Proposes Rule Changes to Facilitate Wind Turbine and Solar Panels in Appropriate Coastal Areas.
October 30th, 2009 | Posted by:
Christopher DeGrezia
0![]()
The Department of Environmental Protection is proposing amendments to the Coastal Permit Program rules, N.J.A.C. 7:7, which contain the coastal general permits and the permits-by-rule. Under this proposal, the Department is proposing a new permit-by-rule and two new coastal general permits for the construction of wind turbines on land; a new permit-by-rule for the construction of solar panels; and is describing the situations in which construction of a wind turbine or solar panel does not require a coastal permit. The Department is also proposing amendments to the Coastal Zone Management rules, N.J.A.C. 7:7E, to facilitate the construction of wind turbines in the coastal zone in appropriate locations. » Read the rest of this entry «
Draft DEP Guidance Calls For Local Zoning Approval for Cleanups that Could Delay or Block Remediation or Development Projects?
October 22nd, 2009 | Posted by:
Christopher DeGrezia
0![]()
By Ellen Radow Sadat, Esq. & Joseph Schmidt, Esq.
The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (”DEP”) is taking another weapon out of its abundant arsenal, which may make it harder to implement reasonable remedial actions and delay cleanups. Under draft guidance, titled “Requirements for Remedial Actions Rendering Properties Unusable,” issued on October 5, 2009, DEP plans to implement a seemingly innocuous provision of the Site Remediation Reform Act (“SRRA”): » Read the rest of this entry «
Site Remediation Reform Act: How Does the Act Impact NJDEP’s Natural Resource Damage Program?
October 20th, 2009 | Posted by:
Christopher DeGrezia
0![]()
There are two significant provisions in the Site Remediation Reform Act (SRRA) that will impact how NJDEP pursues its claims for Natural Resource Damages (NRD). The first is a fairly obvious change to existing law (the Statute of Limitations) setting deadlines for the state to bring a claim for NRD. The second, and more significant provision, stems from a subtle reference nestled amid NJDEP’s newly defined powers of direct remedial oversight. » Read the rest of this entry «
Site Remediation Reform Act: Will the Act Affect the Choice and Pace of a Remedy at My Site?
October 15th, 2009 | Posted by:
Christopher DeGrezia
0![]()
The Site Remediation Reform Act (SRRA) will affect the choice and pace of remedies. SRRA provides that, for any site that is to be used for residential purposes, a licensed day care center, a public or private school, or a charter school, the Licensed Site Remediation Professional (LSRP) must ensure that the person responsible for conducting the remediation completes the remediation in a manner that complies with either unrestricted use standards, a soon to be established “Presumptive Remedy,” or an alternative remedy approved by the NJDEP. » Read the rest of this entry «
World Health Organization Lowers Recommended Action Level For Indoor Radon Gas from 4.0 to 2.7
October 13th, 2009 | Posted by:
Christopher DeGrezia
0![]()
Based on recent studies on indoor radon and lung cancer, the World Health Organization is recommending that homeowners remediate radon levels that exceed 2.7 picocuries per liter (pCi/L). WHO’s prior threshold — and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s current recommended action level – is 4.0 pCi/L. According to WHO, radon is the second cause of lung cancer in the general population, after smoking, and epidemiological studies have provided convincing evidence of an association between indoor radon exposure and lung cancer, even at the relatively low radon levels commonly found in residential buildings. » Read the rest of this entry «
Site Remediation Reform Act: What Does Executive Order No. 140 Add to the Licensend Site Remediation Professional Program?
October 6th, 2009 | Posted by:
Christopher DeGrezia
0![]()
As with any new and major environmental law, the Site Remediation Reform Act (SRRA) had its share of critics from all ends of the political spectrum. The New Jersey environmental activist community was among the most vocal objectors to certain aspects of the proposed Licensed Site Remediation Professional (LSRP) legislation. Executive Order No. 140 was designed by the Governor’s Office to ease the concerns of the environmental groups. » Read the rest of this entry «
Site Remediation Reform Act: How Will the Act Impact the NJDEP’s Voluntary Cleanup Program
October 1st, 2009 | Posted by:
Christopher DeGrezia
0![]()
SRRA effectively abolishes the Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP) for responsible parties by 1) creating an affirmative obligation to remediate the discharge of a hazardous substance and 2) requiring remediation activities to be performed in accordance with mandatory remediation time frames and/or expedited site specific time frames.
Prior to the enactment of SRRA, owners and operators of contaminated properties in New Jersey had several potential remedial options, depending upon the circumstances: » Read the rest of this entry «
Site Remediation Reform Act: Why is Direct Oversite by NJDEP a Bad Thing?
September 28th, 2009 | Posted by:
Christopher DeGrezia
1![]()
If things go according to NJDEP’s plans, all but a handful of sites will proceed through remediation at a much faster pace under the direction of newly minted Licensed Site Remediation Professionals (LSRPs) and without intervention by NJDEP (except through performance of the occasional audit). LSRPs will meet mandatory time frames, implement LSRP-selected remedies or any presumptive remedies, where applicable, and issue the Response Action Outcome (RAO) confirming that remediation is complete. In a few circumstances, however, NJDEP will remain involved in and have direct oversight of the remediation process. SRRA makes that oversight mandatory in certain cases. In other cases, NJDEP will be able to assume direct oversight at its discretion. » Read the rest of this entry «
Site Remediation Reform Act: How Will a Response Action Outcome Issued by a Licensed Site Remediation Professional Differ From a No Further Action Issued by the NJDEP?
September 25th, 2009 | Posted by:
Christopher DeGrezia
0![]()
The No Further Action Letter or NFA is a familiar document to the regulated community and its lenders in New Jersey. A certain comfort level has developed over time with the NFA issued by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP). As with any new regulatory concept, the introduction of the Response Action Outcome (RAO) issued by a newly permitted Licensed Site Remediation Professional (LSRP) will undoubtedly cause some initial concern. » Read the rest of this entry «
